The films of Clint Eastwood speak with us about the present, though, like Juror #2, they've gotten less and less of a chance.

Clint Eastwood's latest film is one of the year's best, but many moviegoers in Houston and around the country can't actually go and see it.

Warning: This story includes spoilers for Juror #2.“This is a story about people.”This was the first thing Clint Eastwood said to first-time screenwriter Jonathan A. Abrams upon reading Abrams’ script for Juror #2,

The box office analyst adds, "Titles like Megalopolis and Here, for whom the target audience is the mature moviegoer, have struggled to inspire the requisite ‘want to see' factor that turns awareness into actual moviegoing,

But after more than five decades in the business, Eastwood’s latest picture, Juror #2, may be his last, according to the master storyteller himself. However, a controversy has been brewing about the picture’s release. Instead of the grand distribution the film deserves (and needs), Warner Brothers seems bent on burying the film.

Throughout his legendary seven-decade career, Eastwood has stuck to his guns while forging a singular path in Hollywood on both sides of the camera.

To that end, many needed clarification as to why Juror #2 was only landing in about 35 theaters in the U.S., while others needed clarification about what Juror #2 was. Some, including The Hollywood Reporter’s sister publication Variety,